Updates on the Fight for Quality Public Education in Brevard County, FL

2026-02-24 - School Board Work Session

7:00 [ Silence ]

7:30 [ Music ]

7:34 » Good afternoon.

7:36 The February 24th, 2026 work session is now in order.

7:39 Paul, roll call, please.

7:41 » Mr. Sheehan?

7:41 » Here.

7:42 » Ms. Wright?

7:42 » Here.

7:43 » Ms. Campbell?

7:43 » Here.

7:44 » Mr. Thomas?

7:44 » Here.

7:45 » Mr. Trean?

7:45 » Here.

7:46 » Please stand for the Pledge of Allegiance.

7:48 I’ll wait for a second.

7:52 I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America

7:56 and to the republic for which it stands,

7:58 one nation, under God, indivisible,

8:01 with liberty and justice for all.

8:06 » Dr. Rendell, can you speak to the board about the items

8:09 on the agenda for today?

8:11 » Thank you, Mr. Chair.

8:13 On today’s agenda, we have rule development

8:15 for some proposed policy revisions.

8:17 This is public hearing number one,

8:19 and then we’ll have a discussion on vaping in schools.

8:22 » First up for rule development is board policy review

8:25 and rule development for the following policy, 3120,

8:28 employment of staff.

8:29 Is there anyone present who wishes to address these items?

8:35 Okay, moving on.

8:38 Moving on to policy 6210.001, allocation and use

8:43 of ad valorem millage.

8:45 Is there anyone here that wishes to discuss these items?

8:50 Do any board members wish to discuss these items?

8:52 » Mr. Chair, if I may?

8:53 » Yes, ma’am.

8:53 » A community member had reached out to me this week

8:55 and asked some questions about the verbiage that’s

8:57 in this policy because it is very specific

8:59 to how we must allocate the funds.

9:01 It replicates what the ballot initiative was when we went

9:04 out for this ad valorem millage,

9:06 which is why it is verbatim the same.

9:09 So I just wanted to clear that up in case they’re watching

9:10 and they see this and they go, “Hey,

9:12 why did you not take my suggestion of looking

9:14 at possibly allocating to different programs?”

9:16 We have to mimic exactly what was on the ballot

9:19 and that’s the reason that it is written in the way that it was.

9:21 So I just wanted to clear that up for the community member.

9:23 » Thank you for doing that clarification.

9:24 Anybody else wish to speak to the item?

9:26 No? All right, moving on.

9:28 Policy 8407, Safe School Officers.

9:32 Is there anyone present who wishes to address this item?

9:37 Any board members wish to talk?

9:39 Nope? Okay.

9:41 Hearing that, that takes care of the policies.

9:43 I brought up a discussion on vaping with some

9:45 of the new news just for clarification.

9:48 There’s nothing that came

9:50 out that has not already been happening inside

9:52 of our schools, but it did bring light to the problem

9:55 that just seems to keep coming back, right?

9:58 So what I was going to bring

9:59 up with the school board members is kind of a plan

10:02 of attack where we can go.

10:04 So I asked the staff, I said I met with some principals,

10:07 I met with some people that create devices,

10:09 I met with a couple other people, staff members

10:12 that are assistant superintendents

10:14 and just said, “Hey, what can we do in this space

10:15 that might be a little bit better?”

10:17 My original thought was to bring forward three components,

10:21 one discussion wrap, you all right?

10:23 » I’m good, thank you.

10:25 » One discussion wrapped around education, communication

10:29 to parents, teachers, staff, everybody else,

10:31 and students and parents.

10:33 The other one that I’m not going to bring forward was

10:35 to increase the discipline for the actual students

10:39 that are vaping, just so you know right now

10:41 if you’re caught vaping with nicotine, you don’t go

10:45 to Career Pathways, you come back and stay inside the school

10:48 and work with the schools, which we have seen some,

10:51 and I will be honest, we have seen some academic achievement

10:53 that follows that model of keeping those kids in school

10:56 and not just sending them off.

10:58 So I’m not willing to bring that forward, just so you guys know.

11:00 The other piece though is the, so we have the education,

11:03 we have that, and then the other device piece.

11:05 So I just kind of wanted to give an update on those and each one

11:08 of them kind of talk and then hear any discussion

11:11 of what you guys think, so.

11:13 So the first one we deal with is the education of staff

11:16 and stuff like that, so I tried to figure out, we need,

11:20 I feel that we could really do some fun stuff in this space

11:24 and educate and create some sort of a thing

11:29 because what we’re running

11:30 into is our vapes now are more addictive

11:33 than the cigarettes were.

11:35 There are chemicals and stuff that are inside the vapes

11:38 that are causing significant students

11:41 to be significantly addicted to it.

11:44 So I had a couple of parents reach out to me

11:47 after I did the piece on Fox 35 and they said

11:49 that their children are addicted to nicotine so bad

11:53 and this was two parents, there must be a facility in Orlando

11:56 that they’re bringing their kids to, it’s that bad.

11:58 And then as I started uncovering it, it is really bad.

12:02 And it’s not so much where I thought, which is why I wanted

12:05 to bring forward the discipline,

12:06 I was like all these kids are just knuckleheads trying to act,

12:08 it’s actually a significantly addictive thing.

12:11 So when I said that, I said, okay, I met with Pam Dampier

12:14 and some other people and I said, hey, is there anything

12:16 in this space that we can do better?

12:17 I would love to hear some ideas prior to coming to the board

12:19 to make sure that I’m there.

12:21 Ms. Dampier had said that in Indian River,

12:23 they had a very successful communications plan that worked

12:26 on different angles and I would like her after we talk here

12:30 to come forward and kind of, not today,

12:33 but meet with you guys one on one like she does and kind

12:35 of go over it to see if you guys had.

12:37 My thought was just to throw it on the table to see

12:40 if there’s anything that you guys felt

12:42 like we could do better or ideas that we could do in order

12:45 to enhance the communication to our parents and our kids

12:48 and stuff like that, because I feel

12:49 like if they knew how bad this really was that they could do,

12:55 we could actually educate them more, if that makes sense.

12:57 Sorry. Does that sound good?

12:59 Can you kind of throw the idea out?

13:00 Let’s talk around about–

13:01 » Yeah, I’d be happy to chime in on this one.

13:04 This one, this has been an issue since I was

13:06 on this board, the day I was elected.

13:07 That’s like the number one thing I was brought into

13:09 and they were going, “We can’t get a hold of vaping.”

13:12 It’s happening everywhere.

13:12 We’re having to close down bathrooms

13:14 because there’s kids that just vape and, I mean,

13:16 back in the day, it used to be cigarettes and I never

13:19 in a million years thought I would say this, but the good thing

13:21 about a cigarette is that it ends when the cigarette is done.

13:23 The problem with the vape is that it continually keeps ongoing

13:26 so it becomes more addictive to these kids.

13:30 And, you know, I talked to some friends in different counties

13:32 and did some research, it sounds like as you did,

13:34 and they were running into issues where kids were

13:36 like flushing them down the toilets

13:37 and causing plumbing issues.

13:39 Multiple kids would be in the bathroom.

13:40 There’s no way to detect which one had the vape.

13:42 So now, are we going to discipline them all?

13:44 And there was just a lot of nuances that went

13:46 around how do we fix this.

13:48 I do believe a good marketing campaign is good

13:50 and this one is probably going to be a little controversial

13:52 but this is what I think.

13:53 If I were leading a school, I would love to see our leaders do.

13:56 They’re confiscating these vapes every single day.

13:59 So why not have a smash the vape on TV program

14:04 where every week they get lined up

14:05 and your principal takes a sledgehammer

14:07 and smashes those vapes for the kids and makes them aware, hey,

14:10 if you guys keep bringing them, guess what?

14:11 We’re going to smash them again and again and again every week.

14:14 And maybe that’s– maybe people don’t like that but I feel

14:17 like if I were a kid, I might go, I don’t want my item smashed

14:20 on TV in front of everyone,

14:22 not necessarily bringing the kid forward.

14:24 But I’m just thinking we should do something

14:27 and it might be a little controversial

14:29 but I think it will send the message home

14:30 that we’re not playing with this

14:31 and we will happily take those vapes right off

14:33 of your hands and we will crush them on TV

14:35 so that every other student can see it.

14:36 » I love the idea.

14:37 Paul, can we take that and–

14:39 » No, I have to look at legal ramifications.

14:42 » When you look at that–

14:43 » And then we’re not giving them back so–

14:45 » Paul, what– I mean–

14:47 » Let me tell you something.

14:48 That’s probably the best idea I’ve heard to get to–

14:51 I’ll be honest.

14:52 We come out with the standard, OK everybody,

14:55 the vapes are addictive and all that stuff, right?

14:58 That is going to fall like a, you know,

15:01 all kinds of metaphors for that.

15:02 But the thing is, is this, is that that will–

15:05 it will start the conversation.

15:07 Paul, ask when you get it.

15:08 I think they become our possession, right?

15:11 Ask if we can–

15:12 » Not necessarily.

15:12 » Well–

15:13 » Like when we confiscate phones,

15:14 we can’t destroy them.

15:15 » Well, that’s not the same.

15:16 That’s not the same as this.

15:16 » But they’re getting– this is an illegal–

15:18 » You have not necessarily if they’re 18 or if they’re of age.

15:22 » No, they can’t bring them into our schools.

15:24 That is against our policy.

15:25 » It’s against policy but it doesn’t make it your property is

15:28 the question that I would want to look at.

15:30 If you destroy it, are you now on the hook

15:31 for replacing the property and then we’re going to be

15:34 in the business of buying bait for–

15:36 » No, that’s absolutely– there’s no way.

15:38 So we’ll revise the policy.

15:39 It’ll become our property.

15:40 I mean, that’s what needs to happen.

15:42 » Yeah.

15:42 » Or we can turn them all over to the sheriff

15:43 and let him smash them.

15:44 I’m sure he’ll be happy to smash them or blow them up

15:46 or whatever the case is.

15:46 » I don’t want the sheriff to be able to do it.

15:48 » I’m sure they’d be happy to step out of the arena.

15:50 » I’ll have to look at it.

15:50 » Can you ask also if we can nickname them when we get them,

15:52 like put nicknames, not kids’ names, nicknames on there?

15:55 That’d be fun.

15:57 Mr. Chair?

15:58 Yes, sir?

15:59 » Sorry.

16:00 » Mr. Rabbit, hold on that one.

16:02 » But I think–

16:02 » Just trying to bring it– rain us in a little bit.

16:04 » Well, no.

16:05 I like it.

16:06 » Now, when we have the meeting with Pam that you’re proposing,

16:09 do you think it would be wise to have Ms. Morningham in the room

16:13 with us and the meeting as well to talk

16:15 about marketing communications,

16:17 her ideas regarding how we might be able

16:19 to do a better job promoting it to the kids?

16:21 » Yeah. Ms. Pam had one that worked in Indian River.

16:24 She said that she brought it forward

16:26 and it just wasn’t the right time

16:27 about a year and a half ago.

16:29 She feels like it might be something

16:30 that we can bring forward and modify.

16:32 My thing is, is that she asked if she could do a better job

16:37 because this was yesterday that I was able to talk to her.

16:39 She didn’t want to come up to the podium and start talking

16:41 about it and so she puts it all together.

16:43 So I asked her if she could just meet with you guys and talk

16:45 about it and then we could come back, I think absolutely.

16:48 But I would like to check.

16:51 You are going to go look and see

16:52 about smashing these things and stuff like that.

16:54 OK, good.

16:55 » Smash the base.

16:56 » Mr. Chair, if I can go next.

16:59 So this is a problem that’s actually going back

17:01 to when it started exploding was when I first got

17:03 on the board back in 2018.

17:05 In fact, we took a group of–

17:07 this is pre-Jewell lawsuit which happened in like 2020.

17:11 In early 2019, we took a group of students, you know,

17:15 the group that Dr. Rendell meets

17:17 with the superintendent always meets

17:18 with of student body presidents, student body leaders.

17:21 We took them to Tallahassee and took them

17:22 into legislators’ offices and said, “What can you do to make–

17:28 you know, change the language, you know, put, you know,

17:31 on the companies, do whatever you can

17:33 to help prevent this problem?”

17:35 And it just has continued to get worse.

17:38 I am in love with the idea of public campaign

17:43 because anything we can do and not just boring–

17:46 whether it involves smashing or whatever, who we have to get

17:49 to is not just the students, we have to get to the heart

17:52 of the parents too.

17:53 » What? Let me see that.

17:54 » I already made an AI-generated campaign photo

17:58 for you.

17:59 » Go ahead, zero in on it.

18:00 » Thank you so much.

18:02 » Michael.

18:03 » But because in some cases,

18:05 parents are actually buying these for their children.

18:07 » Oh, that’s a problem.

18:08 » And they don’t– and you think in today, you know,

18:10 here we are eight years later, you think parents would get it

18:13 but they’re not all getting it.

18:14 But we have the right team in place with GCR.

18:18 We’ve got the right partners in place so we don’t have

18:21 to recreate– reinvent the wheel.

18:23 We have stuff that’s going on that we can push not just

18:26 in a peach jar email that parent–

18:28 requires parents to click on a link but like on our social media

18:31 with our partners so that we’re communicating.

18:33 Look, this is dangerous.

18:35 This is ruining your kid’s health and their minds

18:37 and it’s also ruining their opportunities at school.

18:41 I think that we have– want to touch on–

18:48 because it was mentioned something in the public

18:50 about vape detection systems and I know

18:52 when we first got the Juul money, that was one thing

18:54 that I went to Dr. Rendell and said, “Can we do this?

18:57 Some other schools are doing this.”

18:58 And his feedback from other districts were

19:00 that it was sometimes causing a worse problem

19:02 because of the plumbing issue.

19:03 So I don’t know if that– I mean, we can do multiple things

19:07 but I think it has to involve public campaign, a popular–

19:12 you know it can be shiny bright colors whatever we need but a

19:15 popular campaign

19:16 and also educating our students way back in 2018 2019 one of the

19:20 things we

19:21 realized back then was student to student was some of the best

19:25 communication because adults standing at the stage on the stage

19:30 yes right but if

19:32 the students are to our communicating with each other the

19:36 dangers and the

19:37 importance and that’s a different that’s a different message

19:39 that’s one of their

19:40 that’s beautiful that’s one of the reasons why when we did our

19:45 drug

19:46 diversion program that that social media aspect of it where they’re

19:51 speaking

19:51 their language to communicate to them that they’re better

19:54 without it well

19:55 tobacco doesn’t have the same kind of consequence but if we can

19:58 still have

19:58 some kind of campaign that communicates to them they even with

20:01 just nicotine

20:02 they’re better without it so I think we I absolutely get behind

20:06 that and we’ve

20:06 got the right people and the right partners I did want to just

20:08 highlight

20:09 I’m gonna mention it again tonight because it’s such a hot topic

20:11 right now

20:12 continuing to be but especially right now tomorrow actually our

20:16 drug-free

20:17 coalition it’s been sending out if you guys are on that email

20:21 list but tomorrow

20:22 February 25th at from 2 to 3 there is I think it’s a webinar and

20:28 they can

20:29 register for it navigating conversations about vaping with youth

20:32 and it’s got it

20:34 just it’s for parents like how do you talk to your kids about

20:36 this and so I

20:37 you know it’s not the be all end all but it’s just one more

20:39 resource that just

20:41 happened to be in my inbox when we were having this conversation

20:43 so I wanted to

20:44 share that that’s from the uplifters org which is the new name

20:47 for the Prevention

20:48 Coalition that we’re Brevard County as a part of so I was just

20:52 gonna mention that

20:53 as well that’s all I got right now I concur with the smashing

21:03 but you know I

21:04 think it’s great that we listen to the constituents and we know

21:09 it’s an issue

21:10 so I think us you know not rushing ahead and discussing you know

21:15 disciplinary

21:16 issues and stuff now but you know getting asking you know staff

21:20 to come

21:21 back with some recommendation I think that’s really smart this

21:24 is a really

21:24 good time for us to go back into the schools talk to our

21:27 principals get their

21:28 ideas of what could help what they think could help you know it’s

21:32 always good to

21:33 to get their opinions on things and and some things that have

21:36 worked you know

21:37 not every every school I’m hearing the same issues so maybe they’ve

21:40 done some

21:40 things that we you know could implement district-wide so I think

21:45 that’s really

21:46 good miss Campbell you talked about dating back to 2018 yes I

21:50 was in the

21:51 classroom at the time and it was a it was a crazy time where

21:55 even students

21:56 were doing this in class and getting caught you know because

21:59 they thought

21:59 they were you know bulletproof because it wasn’t smoke you know

22:02 but you could

22:03 you know you could smell the fruit punch flavors you know all

22:06 that kind of stuff

22:07 and they were getting caught but we’re learning every day that

22:13 some of the

22:13 adverse effects of the vaping itself not just the nicotine but

22:18 the other

22:19 chemicals that they put in there I know of a young man that

22:23 works at one of the

22:24 city’s city employee that was actually put in intensive care

22:28 because you know

22:29 he caught something some kind of infection just from the vaping

22:32 and he’s

22:33 a young guy and you know he’s talked about scared straight now I

22:37 mean he’s

22:37 he’s I think he’s still in the hospital and it wasn’t from

22:41 smoking cigarettes it

22:42 was just the vaping part of it so you know information to these

22:47 to these young

22:48 people is important you know they thought it was absolutely it

22:52 was sold to

22:52 them as there’s nothing wrong with this this is just air you

22:56 know it’s just

22:57 vapor you know so and we realize there’s so much now that we we

23:01 know in 2026 and

23:03 we did in 2018 so I think we need it’s it’s really good and it’s

23:06 it’s smart of

23:07 this board to understand it’s a problem we’re gonna take time we’re

23:10 gonna look

23:11 into it and you know together with staff communications and and

23:16 this board I know

23:16 we’re gonna address that so thanks mr. chair so I think as far

23:20 as the

23:20 educational piece we’re all in the grants we allow staff to come

23:23 up with

23:23 kind of miss Dan Pierre to kind of leave the charge and then

23:27 bring it to us in

23:28 our one-on-ones and then they can bring back kind of that to us

23:31 in a school

23:32 board meeting and we can discuss it openly so the public knows

23:35 that good

23:35 okay the other quick question yes sir you’re also as you’re in

23:40 our direction

23:41 to the staff is that there are she would also be coordinating

23:46 with with GCR to

23:47 get all that coordinate because they’re gonna need to coordinate

23:50 with all the

23:51 principles it’ll probably be in a next principal meeting to have

23:54 some sort of

23:54 breakout I met with I had I think six total principles that I

23:58 either talked to

23:59 in a group or individually like let them move throughout

24:02 everybody so it not only

24:03 there but also facilities and stuff like that you know because

24:08 what they were

24:08 telling is is that not only are they in there vaping but they’re

24:12 also destroying

24:12 the bathrooms tell so like toilets and sinks and stuff like that

24:16 being ripped

24:17 off the wall and everything else so that’s one of the other

24:19 reasons why

24:19 they’re reducing the bathrooms it’s not just because of the vapes

24:22 but because

24:22 it’s like animals inside there so facilities needs to be a part

24:25 of the

24:26 conversation and everything else mr. Gibbs can you reach the

24:29 legality of us

24:30 being able to destroy the vapes and respond back to the board on

24:32 that too

24:33 just to see is that I mean I’ll let the board know all right

24:35 thank you with

24:36 sledgehammers and possibly explosions probably not explosion we

24:43 don’t have to

24:43 do that on campus it can be out in the field somewhere yeah we’ll

24:46 do it it’s

24:46 also comes down to like other issues such as what types of

24:50 batteries are in

24:50 these devices I have no idea because it’s a battery it’s

24:53 hazardous material

24:54 and must be disposed of properly I feel like you’re finding

24:58 every reason to say

24:59 no and I need you to find a yes finding a way to destroy them

25:04 there’s like

25:04 multiple layers of issues that we have to look at when you’re

25:07 talking about

25:07 destroying something this guy is doing it and there’s sparks

25:16 coming out oh here

25:18 I got one for my main one for everybody well there’s there’s

25:23 both if you would

25:24 like one I was like I thought miss Campbell be so proud of you

25:27 to make this

25:28 image so look at that share one last note on that one I just

25:35 thought of it

25:36 I’m sure the staff would will think of it or have already

25:38 thought of it but

25:39 having the look for some kind of funding for some kind of

25:41 marketing campaign

25:42 whether through a grant or whatever for anti vaping I think you’re

25:47 gonna find

25:47 that there’s a lot of money in this space a great idea great

25:50 idea that’s

25:51 something okay all right we’re good there okay so the next piece

25:54 that I

25:54 wanted to talk about is is that we know across the board that a

25:57 lot of the

25:58 facilities that we’ve used the devices that we’ve used in order

26:01 to try to

26:02 control it monitor it and stuff like that have failed so they

26:06 have a series

26:07 of devices that they’ve used inside the bathrooms one is smoke

26:10 device so kids

26:11 are using like they’re breathing into their things to avoid it

26:15 they’re

26:15 throwing literally they’re smoking it and breathing it into the

26:19 toilet is what

26:20 some of them are doing to keep it out and they’re able to keep

26:22 it from

26:22 actually even censoring it in some places the smoke detector

26:25 systems that

26:26 they have they’re literally ripping them off the wall and

26:28 throwing them into the

26:29 wall into the toilet so there’s been a lot of mishaps with a lot

26:32 of the devices

26:33 because the people didn’t understand the schools so I had a

26:36 couple of device

26:38 manufacturers that deal with the Defense Department and and the

26:42 because they have

26:44 the same problem in the Navy if you can believe it so one of the

26:46 things that

26:47 they have is devices that actually monitor inside the Navy but

26:50 the thing is

26:51 is that inside the Navy it’s different because they have limited

26:55 rights and

26:55 they’re allowed to do things so so they have that and then they

26:59 also have in the

26:59 Department of Corrections they have the same problem so in the

27:02 Department of

27:02 Corrections they have it to where not only are they monitoring

27:05 inside but they

27:06 have one that registers every kid that goes in and has a light

27:08 up top that says

27:09 okay there’s more than one person you can’t go in there’s just

27:12 all these

27:12 options so I said okay I said it seems like we should we have

27:16 the ability to

27:17 find devices that are outside what’s been used before but the

27:21 problem is is

27:22 that they said they can do anything so for instance you don’t

27:25 have to have a

27:25 device inside the room you can have a device that listens to the

27:29 heat

27:29 signature which puts out radio waves and you can also have one

27:32 that listens to

27:33 the sound where you can have a rock concert going on and all of

27:36 a sudden

27:36 somebody hits a vape and it picks it up and it signals back to

27:39 you admin or

27:40 whatever it is understand so what I said was we have they’re

27:46 doing this in other

27:47 spaces why don’t we find out what’s legal and then bring that

27:51 back and let

27:51 them try to innovate that’s all like if they come back and they

27:54 say we can’t do

27:55 this or it’s illegal or whatever then we’re done but if they can

27:58 find

27:58 something then we go out to RFP or whatever it is for it so Paul

28:02 actually

28:02 mr. Gibbs actually is working on putting together a thing that

28:07 says this is

28:07 what’s legal inside of the monitoring of the bathroom because

28:11 what they were

28:11 saying is is that they have AI that does not record it just

28:16 listens for events so

28:17 if there’s a crack in the crystal or in the porcelain say for

28:20 instance it alerts

28:21 it alerts if all of those things and then there’s ways to tie in

28:24 cameras and

28:25 everything else so I just said way above my pay grade Paul if

28:28 you can figure out

28:29 how much is inside there and then maybe I have one of these

28:32 groups try to put

28:33 something together if they do great if they don’t no big deal no

28:35 cost on us

28:36 nobody’s looking to get any money so what do you guys think on

28:39 that good good

28:40 on that go ahead mr. John I’m all for enforcement but I also

28:45 think we just

28:46 need to focus equal attention on prevention and having a

28:49 consistent

28:50 message throughout the year on it yeah that’s there might be

28:56 some really great

28:57 technology that we haven’t seen or haven’t been exposed to but I

29:00 would like

29:00 to know more about it yeah that’s it and just from the pure

29:03 health standpoint

29:03 yeah I’m 100% against vaping in school and I want to enforce the

29:08 rules but I’m

29:09 what if we can prevent them from doing it you know or educate

29:11 them where they

29:12 don’t want to do it then that’s I think that would be cost-effective

29:16 all right I

29:16 agree but you’re okay with them researching stuff like that to

29:19 see what

29:19 comes up absolutely miss Campbell okay we’re all good yep okay

29:24 that’s all I’ve

29:24 got does anybody else have anything else that they wish to

29:26 discuss I can’t let

29:28 the conversation go by without saying one thing it is

29:30 unfortunate that the

29:33 chair went out to the public with something with before having a

29:37 conversation with the board we’ve had good conversations today

29:40 and before

29:41 having a conversation with the superintendent we can say no to

29:46 request

29:47 for the press and I think it’s always a good idea I’m just gonna

29:49 put this out

29:50 there as a reminder that the chair speaks for the board and

29:53 sometimes the

29:55 chair speaks ahead of himself and I think this was a good

29:59 conversation and I

30:00 feel like this may happen before that happened so I’m just gonna

30:04 register my

30:05 complaint with that how that happened and then when we do it

30:08 like this where

30:09 we’re bringing in conversations with us all together and we’re

30:13 going to have

30:13 further conversations with the staff and the people who are

30:16 gonna help make these

30:17 decisions to help give us more information that is a better

30:21 representation of what we as a district want to do what we as a

30:24 board want to do

30:25 we’ve done good work today and this very brief conversation and

30:29 getting some

30:29 direction going getting some thoughts going but this is the

30:32 better process and

30:33 so we just had to I didn’t want to leave that unsaid before we

30:38 walk away from

30:38 this conversation today that sounds great I think you completely

30:41 misinterpreted and misunderstood what was said so I was asked by

30:44 the Fox News

30:45 to what were we gonna do and I said as a board member I’m going

30:49 to bring this

30:50 before the board and have this discussion that’s what we did so

30:53 there’s

30:54 nothing wrong with that there’s not me saying we’re going to

30:56 move forward to do

30:56 this we’re gonna move forward to do that we’re gonna have this

30:59 discussion that is

30:59 completely within the right of the school board chair that is

31:02 completely

31:02 with the right within any of the other board members to have a

31:05 conversation

31:05 that says that they’re gonna bring something forward so I would

31:08 just I

31:08 would respectfully disagree with you in the conversation that

31:12 you had well mr.

31:12 chair when you tell the public that we’re going to start expelling

31:15 students

31:16 that’s different conversation then we’re part of a conversation

31:19 and I made the

31:20 clearance at the beginning of it to talk about it doesn’t matter

31:26 it’s that we

31:27 were gonna bring it forward before the board that’s completely

31:29 within the right

31:30 of what I have I actually had conversations at the beginning of

31:33 it and

31:33 decided to explain that to the public so there’s nothing wrong

31:35 with that that’s

31:36 within the scope of the school board chairman or any other board

31:38 member

31:39 we’re all good I have one more thing okay board obviously our

31:45 district is not

31:46 exempted from all the other districts that have been seeing

31:48 different

31:49 demonstrations that are going on around the state around the

31:51 country and

31:52 currently we have a policy in place for disorder and

31:55 demonstration is what we

31:56 have which is sort of kind of like it’s hitting lightly on what

32:00 it looks like if

32:01 a student’s gonna hold a protest on school sites and so I am

32:05 just asking I

32:06 have done a little bit of research on this and consulted with a

32:08 few other

32:09 people in different districts on what it looks like from their

32:11 district

32:11 standpoint and what they are doing I think it would be wise of

32:14 us to go ahead

32:15 and look at that policy which the policy is 5520 and go ahead

32:18 and probably put

32:19 some more teeth to this policy that is very specific it’s

32:22 nonpartisan in nature

32:23 it’s just to protect the integrity of our school sites being a

32:26 learning

32:27 environment and not becoming a ground place for demonstrations

32:30 to take place

32:31 and so I’m gonna pass out and I’ll give everyone Paul I think I

32:34 make copies of

32:35 all these a couple of suggestions is obviously we can we can add

32:39 us on a

32:40 future agenda and and kind of work through it but just to put

32:43 some more

32:43 teeth behind what we’re doing here and make sure that we are all

32:47 on the same

32:47 page because I have heard from parents all over the place how

32:50 frustrated they

32:51 were that this was taking place on our school sites and so I had

32:55 to clarify a

32:56 lot of what was going on was off of school site and children 100%

32:59 have the

32:59 right to protest outside of schools parents 100% of the right to

33:03 check their

33:03 children out of our school and go protest outside of the school

33:06 that exists

33:07 that is that is their right to do so but our kids are in the

33:10 classroom to learn

33:11 and so when they’re when they’re being exposed to different

33:13 demonstrations that

33:14 are not advantageous to their learning environment we need to

33:17 make sure that we

33:18 have the the tools in place that we can respond and respond

33:21 equally across the

33:22 board so I’m just asking in the future can we go ahead and look

33:25 at in the next

33:25 upcoming workshop mr. chair possibly adding 5520 on there and

33:29 work through

33:30 this policy to put some more teeth to it and hopefully come out

33:34 with something

33:35 that’s good and across the board equally fair Paul when is the

33:39 next workshop that

33:40 we have do you have that by any chance I think it’s at the next

33:43 board meeting day

33:44 all right do you think that March 10th is an early enough time

33:48 for us to kind

33:49 of put this on the agenda have a little bit of thought process I

33:52 can bring you

33:52 Neola’s template so the board can review what Neola recommends

33:57 and what our

33:57 current policy is and you guys give us direction on where you

34:01 want to go Paul

34:03 did you get a copy of the policy that I just yeah can we since

34:07 we’re gonna be

34:08 meeting with miss Pam d’ampierre over the communication stuff

34:11 possibly do you

34:12 think that we could meet with miss Pam d’ampierre prior to the

34:14 10th over some

34:15 of this stuff - yeah I mean there’s cop I can give her a copy of

34:18 it if she wants

34:19 to see the policy as well to see if there’s any issues that she

34:21 sees because

34:21 obviously we will have to look at the student code of conduct

34:24 because it got

34:25 everything that we do obviously kind of correlates back there to

34:28 how we handle

34:29 any kind of discipline that takes place so I’ll give you a copy

34:32 of this I know

34:33 Pam’s going not the student code of conduct thank you miss Dan

34:36 Pierre you’re

34:36 the best but yeah absolutely no I absolutely agree with you I

34:41 absolutely

34:42 think this is something to take a look at I think that we can

34:44 bring this back

34:45 at the next meeting I think that um for discussion right and

34:49 then staff can work

34:50 through what we want and then bring it back dr. and does that

34:53 sound about right

34:53 for you yeah March 10th would be the next opportunity to start

34:56 the

34:56 conversation okay so let’s go ahead and do if that’s okay Paul

34:59 let’s put it on

35:00 the agenda for March 10th and if you can bring the Neola back

35:03 and then if the

35:03 board members can kind of look at what they’re looking at I

35:06 wholeheartedly

35:06 agree with you with some of the stuff that I saw it you know it’s

35:10 needed so

35:11 thank you for so much for bringing that forward we might have an

35:15 acronym for

35:16 that here that we might want to name it as all right everybody

35:21 else good talk

35:22 about that there was I don’t know if it would be easier to hash

35:26 out calendar

35:26 while we’re all here March 13th as an off-site was mentioned I

35:29 don’t know if

35:30 when we talked about that if everybody remember that that’s a

35:32 student holiday

35:33 so for those of us who have kids at home who might not want to

35:37 have a meeting all

35:38 day meeting on a day that our kids are going to be off so we had

35:43 an original

35:45 date of March 3rd and then dr. Rendell had some school sites

35:48 that he wasn’t

35:48 able to move because they had some special events we tried to

35:51 move it to

35:51 March 17th but mr. Thomas because we wanted to try to host it at

35:56 his facility

35:56 was not able to acquire for March 17 so I thought March 13th

36:01 everybody had

36:02 agreed that they could make it and we only plan on being there

36:05 for three hours

36:06 in the morning now she does bring up a good point that we do

36:09 have our student

36:10 I’m okay with that because my yeah but if you know that is a

36:14 good question to

36:15 ask is everybody still okay with meeting on the 13th for three

36:18 hours for an

36:19 off Friday the 13th what’s wrong I’ve been trying to get this

36:23 thing all the

36:23 way through so yeah meeting so if we understood and what I sent

36:28 to Lena was I

36:29 am available but I prefer not to considering that it was a

36:32 student they

36:32 off you know and it since four of us are student for parents of

36:36 BPS students you

36:37 know I just want to make sure I knew that before they said yes

36:40 so if I knew

36:41 kind of what the goal of the meeting was that would be probably

36:44 helpful yep I can

36:46 email it to you yeah I I already said I’m available on that day

36:49 so I have an

36:50 evening commitment that night but I’m I can send it to you and I

36:54 think mr.

36:56 Thomas you’re good mmm Jean you’re good okay and dr. Endell was

36:59 good on that day

37:00 too so I can any absolutely I can get sent to us so I can you

37:05 know calendar

37:06 yep yep sounds like a plan okay mr. Thomas are you good

37:09 everybody else is

37:10 good across the board good dr. Adele do you have anything I do

37:13 not all right

37:14 mr. Gibbs yes yep all right meetings turn 30 minutes

37:44 you